The Seay Firm LLC

Atlanta Entertainment Lawyer

  • About Us
    • John E. Seay, Esq.
    • Philip A. Ordonez, Esq.
    • Haley Carlson
    • Directions
  • Practice Areas
    • Music Law
    • Film & TV Law
    • Miscellaneous Entertainment Law
    • Copyrights & Trademarks
    • Small Business Services
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Atlanta entertainment lawyer / Court Okays Section 203 Termination of Transfer of Copyright

September 15, 2013

Court Okays Section 203 Termination of Transfer of Copyright

For now, we can rejoice.  The Federal District Court in Los Angeles recently ruled that artists can, in some circumstances, terminate the transfers of copyright that they may have executed in favor of record labels or publishing companies some 35 years ago.  As you may recall, I discussed Section 203 terminations of transfers here and here.

For years, and in fact still, record labels and publishing companies argued that songs recorded or written pursuant to contract were technically “works for hire,” that is, works made by employees in the scope of their employment.  The only problem was that artists  were never treated like employees of the companies for which they wrote or recorded, and only works created by employees are subject to the work for hire doctrine.

But though that logic was always spurious at best, we hadn’t been able to test it until now. Section 203 states that transfers of copyright made on or after 1978 can be terminated after 35 years.  Thirty-five years after 1978 is 2013.  The case discussed in the article linked to above was brought by a member of the Village People, and it is the first of many. Although the decision of the District Court in Los Angeles is binding only upon that district and may be appealed, it’s a good start and hopefully other jurisdictions, and potentially the Supreme Court, will agree and eventually make this the law of the land.

On a final note, it will be interesting to see how these subsequent decisions, if they go the same way as the decision of the District Court in Los Angeles, will affect the already struggling major labels, which in some cases have only lasted this long due to the revenue that they receive from the continuing sales of their back catalogs.  Regardless, I think that this is the right decision and it should put more money into the pockets of artists.

If you wrote a song in the late 70s or 80s and want to begin the process of potentially reclaiming your copyrights, then read this article and this article and contact us.  You have to comply with the precise language of Section 203 in order to effectuate the termination.

For the Village People, congratulations – you don’t have to stay at the YMCA tonight.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: Atlanta entertainment lawyer, Copyright, Entertainment Law, Music Industry Musings, Section 203, Termination of Transfer Tagged With: atlanta entertainment lawyer, Entertainment Law, Los Angeles Federal District Court, publishing companies, record labels, Section 203, termination of transfer, Village People, work for hire, YMCA

Contact Us

  • *Disclaimer: Your viewing of the content on this website, or your use of this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm, does not establish an attorney-client relationship.  Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10.0John Eric Seay
 
John E. Seay
 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Check out our spotify client playlist

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Website by Misfit Ideas, LLC